"12 Angry Men" centers around a jury's deliberations in a homicide case. A young man is on trial for allegedly murdering his father. The film showcases the jury's negotiations, where initially, all jurors except one vote guilty. Throughout their discussions, the jurors review the evidence and testimonies, revealing their personal biases and uncertainties. Gradually, they begin to question the certainty of the boy's guilt. The story is a compelling examination of consensus-building and the power of reasonable doubt in a jury room.
Use in class
Regarding the application of "12 Angry Men" in business school classes, the film is an excellent resource for teaching various aspects of leadership, group dynamics, decision-making, and ethics. It provides a rich case study in how individuals' personal backgrounds, biases, and interpersonal skills can impact group decision-making processes. The film can be used to illustrate the challenges of consensus-building in teams, the importance of critical thinking and challenging assumptions, and the ethical considerations in decision-making processes. It is particularly relevant for courses in organizational behavior, leadership, team management, negotiation, and business ethics, where students can learn about the complexity of group dynamics and the importance of thoughtful, ethical decision-making in a business context.
Trailer
